So, is there a way to run JD2 with a different JRE but still keep the non-standard addons like fxavcodecplugin-*.so? (And why are both fxavcodecplugin-52.so and fxavcodecplugin-53.so in the directory?) I guess libavcodec is just used for grabbing sound out of video files?Ĭode: -Thread: 25:OldLogL.log. I didn't run JD2 very long with either system JRE. There are probably other things that didn't work, too. I assume this is expected, because /opt/jd2/jre includes some extra stuff for sound? With /usr/lib/jvm/java-7-openjdk-amd64/jre, I don't get sound for captcha popups. (But until then, nobody should bother trying to use JD2 on openjdk-8, unless they use a workaround like copying libjavajpeg.so from openjdk-7, which apparently works. Hopefully Ubuntu 15.04 will ship a fixed openjdk-8-jre package. Turns out, openJDK 8 was missing that class! See **External links are only visible to Support Staff****External links are only visible to Support Staff**, closed Mar 17, 2015. The log files pointed to a problem with the JPEGImageReader class. With /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64/jre, the plugin (and probably many others) get stuck trying to display a captcha. With /opt/jd2/jre, everything works fine. IDK if you guys are interested in newer packaging for JD2, like maybe packaging a JD2 web-installer instead of just a JD1 web-installer for the **External links are only visible to Support Staff****External links are only visible to Support Staff** PPA. OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 25.40-b13, mixed mode)Without a Debian / Ubuntu package that has a Depends: on a JRE, though, you can't assume the user won't un-install a JVM. OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_40-internal-b09) OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 24.75-b04, mixed mode) $ /usr/lib/jvm/java-7-openjdk-amd64/bin/java -version Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 23.21-b01, mixed mode) Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.7.0_21-b11) JD2's JRE (as installed from JD1) is quite old. (Is this even the "correct" way to use a different JRE? It was the first config file I saw the shell script checking.)
#Java 1.7.0_21 download install#
Is this because you ship your JRE with libs like fxavcodecplugin-52.so? Or does the installer not even ask if you want to use the system JRE because your Linux/Unix install uses the portable-app layout, with everything self-contained?Īnyway, I tried editting /opt/jd2/.install4j/pref_jre.cfg to change the JRE that the startup scripts use.
#Java 1.7.0_21 download update#
I guess you guys are too busy making JD2 great to update the web site that often.Īnyway, I see JD2 installed a JRE, without asking me if I wanted to just use the system JRE. I didn't find that out until after I'd already installed JD1. So it really makes sense for new users at this point to learn their way around JD2 in the first place, instead of learning JD1 when it's already deprecated. Anyway, my point is, I ended up installing an installer (ubuntu pkg) for an installer (jd1) for JD2, because your web site doesn't make it clear that JD2 is at least late beta, fully usable, and JD1 is end-of-lifed. Anyway, the first thing JD1 did was suggest I install JD2. I was just looking for something to let my firefox downloads run outside of firefox itself, because downloads make firefox use ridiculous CPU time. When I first installed JD2 a few weeks ago, it was from the Ubuntu PPA which turned out to be a downloader for JD1. Is that still true on Linux? I guess whatever documentation there is exists only as forum posts?
![java 1.7.0_21 download java 1.7.0_21 download](https://www.technize.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/Java-7-update-10-450x274.jpg)
I think I've seen the JD2 team say that JDK8 is prefered.